Mark Steyn: ‘Europeans Will Become The New Jews’

Mark Steyn is an open critic of Islam and has repeatedly warned that Europe is poised at the top of a slippery slope.

Here  is a recent piece by him which I urge you to read; it first appeared in Commentary Magazine

“On Holocaust Memorial Day 2008, a group of just under 100 people—Londoners and a few visitors —took a guided tour of the old Jewish East End. They visited, among other sites of interest, the birthplace of my old chum Lionel Bart, the author of Oliver! Three generations of schoolchildren have grown up singing Bart’s lyric:

Consider yourself

At ’ome!

Consider yourself

One of the family!

Those few dozen London Jews considered themselves at ’ome. But they weren’t. Not any more. The tour was abruptly terminated when the group was pelted with stones, thrown by “youths”—or to be slightly less evasive, in the current euphemism of Fleet Street, “Asian” youths. “If you go any further, you’ll die,” they shouted, in between the flying rubble.

A New Yorker who had just moved to Britain to start a job at the Metropolitan University had her head cut open and had to be taken to the Royal London Hospital at Whitechapel, causing her to miss the Holocaust Day “interfaith memorial service” at the East London Central Synagogue. Her friend, Eric Litwack from Canada, was also struck but did not require stitches. But if you hadn’t recently landed at Heathrow, it wasn’t that big a deal, not these days: Nobody was killed or permanently disfigured. And given the number of Jewish community events that now require security, perhaps Her Majesty’s Constabulary was right and these Londoners walking the streets of their own city would have been better advised to do so behind a police escort.


A European Holocaust Memorial Day on which Jews are stoned sounds like a parody of the old joke that the Germans will never forgive the Jews for Auschwitz. According to a 2005 poll by the University of Bielefeld, 62 percent of Germans “are sick of all the harping on about German crimes against the Jews”—which is a cheerfully straightforward way of putting it. Nevertheless, when it comes to “harping on,” these days it’s the Jews who are mostly on the receiving end. While we’re reprising old gags, here’s one a reader reminded me of a couple of years ago, during Israel’s famously “disproportionate” incursion into Lebanon: One day the U.N. Secretary General proposes that, in the interest of global peace and harmony, the world’s soccer players should come together and form one United Nations global soccer team.

“Great idea,” says his deputy. “Er, but who would we play?”

“Israel, of course.”

Ha-ha. It always had a grain of truth, now it’s the whole loaf.

“Israel is unfashionable,” a Continental foreign minister said to me a decade back. “But maybe Israel will change, and then fashions will change.” Fashions do change. But however Israel changes, this fashion won’t. The shift of most (non-American) Western opinion against the Jewish state that began in the 1970s was, as my Continental politician had it, simply a reflection of casting: Israel was no longer the underdog but the overdog, and why would that appeal to a post-war polytechnic Euro Left unburdened by Holocaust guilt?

Fair enough. Fashions change. But the new Judenhass is not a fashion, simply a stark reality that will metastasize in the years ahead and leave Israel isolated in the international “community” in ways that will make the first decade of this century seem like the good old days.

A few months after the curtailed Holocaust Day tour, I found myself in that particular corner of Tower Hamlets for the first time in years. Specifically, on Cable Street—the scene of a famous battle in 1936, when Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists, in a crude exercise of political muscle, determined to march through the heart of Jewish East London. They were turned back by a mob of local Jews, Irish Catholic dockers, and Communist agitators, all standing under the Spanish Civil War slogan: “No Pasaran.” They shall not pass.

From “No Pasaran” to “If you go any further, you’ll die” is a story not primarily of anti-Semitism but of unprecedented demographic transformation. Beyond the fashionable “anti-Zionism” of the Euro Left is a starker reality: The demographic energy not just in Lionel Bart’s East End but in almost every Western European country is “Asian.” Which is to say, Muslim. A recent government statistical survey reported that the United Kingdom’s Muslim population is increasing ten times faster than the general population. Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp, and many other Continental cities from Scandinavia to the Côte d’Azur will reach majority Muslim status in the next few years.

Brussels has a Socialist mayor, which isn’t that surprising, but he presides over a caucus a majority of whose members are Muslim, which might yet surprise those who think we’re dealing with some slow, gradual, way-off-in-the-future process here. But so goes Christendom at the dawn of the third millennium: the ruling party of the capital city of the European Union is mostly Muslim.

There are generally two responses to this trend: The first is that it’s like a cast change in Cats or, perhaps more precisely, David Merrick’s all-black production of Hello, Dolly! Carol Channing and her pasty prancing waiters are replaced by Pearl Bailey and her ebony chorus, but otherwise the show is unchanged. Same set, same words, same arrangements: France will still be France, Germany Germany, Belgium Belgium.

The second response is that the Islamicization of Europe entails certain consequences, and it might be worth exploring what these might be. There are already many points of cultural friction—from British banks’ abolition of children’s “piggy banks” to the enjoining of public doughnut consumption by Brussels police during Ramadan. And yet on one issue there is remarkable comity between the aging ethnic Europeans and their young surging Muslim populations: A famous poll a couple of years back found that 59 percent of Europeans regard Israel as the greatest threat to world peace.

Fifty-nine percent? What the hell’s wrong with the rest of you? Hey, relax: In Germany, it was 65 percent; Austria, 69 percent; the Netherlands, 74 percent. For purposes of comparison, in a recent poll of Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—i.e., the “moderate” Arab world—79 percent of respondents regard Israel as the greatest threat to world peace. As far as I know, in the last year or two, they haven’t re-tested that question in Europe, possibly in case Israel now scores as a higher threat level in the Netherlands than in Yemen.

To be sure, there are occasional arcane points of dispute: one recalls, in the wake of the July 7 bombings, the then London Mayor Ken Livingstone’s somewhat tortured attempts to explain why blowing up buses in Tel Aviv is entirely legitimate whereas blowing up buses in Bloomsbury is not. Yet these are minimal bumps on a smooth glide path: The more Europe’s Muslim population grows, the more restive and disassimilated it becomes, the more enthusiastically the establishment embraces “anti-Zionism,” as if the sinister Jewess is the last virgin left to toss in the volcano—which, given the 13-year old “chavs” and “slappers” face down in pools of their own vomit in most British shopping centers of a Friday afternoon, may indeed be the case. For today’s Jews, unlike on Cable Street in 1936, there are no Catholic dockworkers or Communist agitators to stand shoulder to shoulder. In post-Christian Europe, there aren’t a lot of the former (practicing Catholics or practicing dockers), and as for the intellectual Left, it’s more enthusiastic in its support of Hamas than many Gazans.

To which there are many Israelis who would brusquely reply: So what? Pity the poor Jew who has ever relied on European “friends.” Yet there is a difference of scale between the well-established faculty-lounge disdain for “Israeli apartheid” and a mass psychosis so universal it’s part of the air you breathe. For a glimpse of the future, consider the (for the moment) bizarre circumstances of the recent Davis Cup First Round matches in Sweden. They had been scheduled long ago to be played in the Baltiska Hallen stadium in Malmo. Who knew which team the Swedes would draw? Could have been Chile, could have been Serbia. Alas, it was Israel.

Malmo is Sweden’s most Muslim city, and citing security concerns, the local council ordered the three days of tennis to be played behind closed doors. Imagine being Amir Hadad and Andy Ram, the Israeli doubles players, or Simon Aspelin and Robert Lindstedt, the Swedes. This was supposed to be their big day. But the vast stadium is empty, except for a few sports reporters and team officials. And just outside the perimeter up to 10,000 demonstrators are chanting, “Stop the match!” and maybe, a little deeper into the throng, they’re shouting, “We want to kill all Jews worldwide” (as demonstrators in Copenhagen, just across the water, declared just a few weeks earlier). Did Aspelin and Lindstedt wonder why they couldn’t have drawn some less controversial team, like Zimbabwe or Sudan? By all accounts, it was a fine match, thrilling and graceful, with good sportsmanship on both sides. Surely, such splendid tennis could have won over the mob, and newspapers would have reported that by the end of the match the Israeli players had the crowd with them all the way. But they shook ’em off at Helsingborg.

Do you remember the “road map” summit held in Jordan just after the U.S. invasion of Iraq? It seemed a big deal at the time: The leaders of Israel and the Palestinian Authority, the U.S. president, all the A-list dictators of the Arab League. Inside the swank resort, it was all very collegial, smiles and handshakes. Outside, flags fluttered—Jordan’s, America’s, Saudi Arabia’s, Egypt’s, Palestine’s. But not Israel’s. King Abdullah of Jordan had concluded it would be too provocative to advertise the Zionist Entity’s presence on Jordanian soil even at a summit supposedly boasting they were all on the same page. Malmo’s tennis match observed the same conventions: I’m sure the Swedish tennis wallahs were very gracious hosts behind the walls of the stockade, and the unmarked car to the airport was top of the line. How smoothly the furtive maneuvers of the Middle East transfer to the wider world.


When Western governments are as reluctant as King Abdullah to fly the Star of David, those among the citizenry who choose to do so have a hard time. In Britain in January, while “pro-Palestinian” demonstrators were permitted to dress up as hook-nosed Jews drinking the blood of Arab babies, the police ordered counter-protesters to put away their Israeli flags. In Alberta, in the heart of Calgary’s Jewish neighborhood, the flag of Hizballah (supposedly a proscribed terrorist organization) was proudly waved by demonstrators, but one solitary Israeli flag was deemed a threat to the Queen’s peace and officers told the brave fellow holding it to put it away or be arrested for “inciting public disorder.” In Germany, a student in Duisburg put the Star of David in the window of an upstairs apartment on the day of a march by the Islamist group Milli Görüs, only to have the cops smash his door down and remove the flag. He’s now trying to get the police to pay for a new door. Ah, those Jews. It’s always about money, isn’t it?

Peter, the student in Duisberg, says he likes to display the Israeli flag because anti-Semitism in Europe is worse than at any other time since the Second World War. Which is true. But, if you look at it from the authorities’ point of view, it’s not about Jew-hatred; it’s a simple numbers game. If a statistically insignificant Jewish population gets upset, big deal. If the far larger Muslim population—and, in some French cities, the youth population (i.e., the demographic that riots) is already pushing 50 percent—you have a serious public-order threat on your hands. We’re beyond the anti-Semitic and into the ad hoc utilitarian: The King Abdullah approach will seem like the sensible way to avoid trouble. To modify the UN joke: Whom won’t we play? Israel, of course. Not in public.

One Saturday afternoon a few weeks ago, a group wearing “BOYCOTT ISRAEL” T-shirts entered a French branch of Carrefour, the world’s largest supermarket chain, and announced themselves. They then systematically advanced down every aisle examining every product, seizing all the items made in Israel and piling them into carts to take away and destroy. Judging from the video they made, the protesters were mostly Muslim immigrants and a few French leftists. But more relevant was the passivity of everyone else in the store, both staff and shoppers, all of whom stood idly by as private property was ransacked and smashed, and many of whom when invited to comment expressed support for the destruction. “South Africa started to shake once all countries started to boycott their products,” one elderly lady customer said. “So what you’re doing, I find it good.”

Others may find Germany in the ‘30s the more instructive comparison. “It isn’t silent majorities that drive things, but vocal minorities,” the Canadian public intellectual George Jonas recently wrote. “Don’t count heads; count decibels. All entities—the United States, the Western world, the Arab street—have prevailing moods, and it’s prevailing moods that define aggregates at any given time.” Last December, in a well-planned attack on iconic Bombay landmarks symbolizing power and wealth, Pakistani terrorists nevertheless found time to divert one-fifth of their manpower to torturing and killing a handful of obscure Jews helping the city’s poor in a nondescript building. If this was a territorial dispute over Kashmir, why kill the only rabbi in Bombay? Because Pakistani Islam has been in effect Arabized. Demographically, in Europe and elsewhere, Islam has the numbers. But ideologically, radical Islam has the decibels—in Turkey, in the Balkans, in Western Europe.

And the prevailing mood in much of the world makes Israel an easy sacrifice. Long before Muslims are a statistical majority, there will be three permanent members of the Security Council—Britain, France, Russia—for whom the accommodation of Islam is a domestic political imperative.


On the heels of his call for the incorporation of Sharia within British law, the Archbishop of Canterbury gave an interview to the Muslim News praising Islam for making “a very significant contribution to getting a debate about religion into public life.” Well, that’s one way of putting it. The urge to look on the bright side of its own remorseless cultural retreat will intensify: Once Europeans have accepted a not entirely voluntary biculturalism, they will see no reason why Israel should not do the same, and they will embrace a one-state, one-man, one-vote solution for the land between the Jordan and the Mediterranean.

The Muslim world has spent decades peddling the notion that the reason a vast oil-rich region stretching thousands of miles is politically deformed and mired in grim psychoses is all because of a tiny strip of turf barely wider than my New Hampshire township. It will make an ever more convenient scapegoat for the problems of a far vaster territory from the mountains of Morne to the Urals. There was a fair bit of this in the days after 9/11. As Richard Ingrams wrote on the following weekend in the London Observer: “Who will dare to damn Israel?”

Well, take a number and get in line. The dust had barely settled on the London Tube bombings before a reader named Derrick Green sent me a congratulatory e-mail: “I bet you Jewish supremacists think it is Christmas come early, don’t you? Incredibly, you are now going to get your own way even more than you did before, and the British people are going to be dragged into more wars for Israel.”

So it will go. British, European, and even American troops will withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan, and a bomb will go off in Madrid or Hamburg or Manchester, and there will be nothing left to blame except Israeli “disproportion.” For the remnants of European Jewry, the already discernible migration of French Jews to Quebec, Florida, and elsewhere will accelerate. There are about 150,000 Jews in London today—it’s the thirteenth biggest Jewish city in the world. But there are approximately one million Muslims. The highest number of Jews is found in the 50-54 age group; the highest number of Muslims are found in the four-years-and-under category. By 2025, there will be Jews in Israel, and Jews in America, but not in many other places. Even as the legitimacy of a Jewish state is rejected, the Jewish diaspora—the Jewish presence in the wider world—will shrivel.

And then, to modify Richard Ingrams, who will dare not to damn Israel? There’ll still be a Holocaust Memorial Day, mainly for the pleasures it affords to chastise the new Nazis. As Anthony Lipmann, the Anglican son of an Auschwitz survivor, wrote in 2005: “When on 27 January I take my mother’s arm—tattoo number A-25466—I will think not just of the crematoria and the cattle trucks but of Darfur, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Jenin, Fallujah.” Jenin?

You can see why they’ll keep Holocaust Day on the calendar: In an age when politicians are indifferent or downright hostile to Israel’s “right to exist,” it’s useful to be able to say, “But some of my best photo-ops are Jewish.”

The joke about Mandatory Palestine was that it was the twice-promised land. But isn’t that Europe, too? And perhaps Russia and maybe Canada, a little ways down the line? Two cultures jostling within the same piece of real estate. Not long ago, I found myself watching the video of another “pro-Palestinian” protest in central London with the Metropolitan Police retreating up St. James’s Street to Piccadilly in the face of a mob hurling traffic cones and jeering, “Run, run, you cowards!” and “Allahu akbar!” You would think the deluded multi-culti progressives would understand: In the end, this isn’t about Gaza, this isn’t about the Middle East; it’s about them. It may be some consolation to an ever-lonelier Israel that, in one of history’s bleaker jests, in the coming Europe the Europeans will be the new Jews.”

Well said indeed, Mr Steyn.

The question is: does Europe give a damn?

6 thoughts on “Mark Steyn: ‘Europeans Will Become The New Jews’

  1. I don’t think they’re ‘kooks’. Unfortunately they are articulate and often very intelligent. As were many of the top ranking and most malevolent Nazis.

    And I totally agree with you; the BNP is a BIG worry. The mainstream parties are a shambles; especially with the most recent expenses scandal. The BNP will be crowing over how many floating voters they have gained as a result of Labour and Tory financial antics!

    I certainly do not think you are ‘mad’ or ‘over reacting’. On the contrary, I AGREE with you that never before has the BNP stood such a good chance of gaining more power. And we have the mainstream political parties to thank for that!

    I suppose one hope is that an early election will be forced through and Brown will be voted out. There is a big petition being organised by the SUN newspaper to try and pressure Labour to do just that, in fact.

    Let’s pray that whatever happens, when it comes to it, people don’t throw their support behind the BNP. It would be a disaster.

    Many thanks for your comments – I may return to add more comments as I’ve had to write this response in a rush:)

  2. I’m not supporting them, I’m saying ->LOOK> be very very afraid.

    I hate pointing it out, but Hitler’s party didn’t start ‘evil’ as such, it turned evil over time as collective insanity evolved, but it got where it was because like the Taliban in Afghanistan, in a totally fubared world, it offered the Western version of Sharia mixed with restored national pride. A simple cookbook on how to be a proud, righteous moral human being.

    And you tell me in one breath, the BNP will do bad things ™ and in the next, they are a bunch of kooks, let’s not worry about them, when in two posts I’ve been attempting to warn you at what is going on.

    Look I’d love for you to tell me I’m just being too worried and being a silly, overreacting mad person, it’s the best outcome I could think of. But you’re totally overlooking any argument I make and just giving me the party line is worrying…!

    Anyway, we’ll see, and I hope that the future will prove me wrong! ;-(

  3. I have already checked out the BNP website – and was appalled at what I saw there. I have also read their manifesto and am aware of their policies. The BNP is a neo Nazi group and nothing you can say alters that fundamental fact. Are you aware of the close links between the BNP and many far right, neo Nazi groups across Europe…?

    Have you watched the video clip linked to in the post, on this blog, about the BNP? Any group that places swastikas on the doors of its meeting room, and which gives the Hitler salute, and which claims ‘there is no such thing as a black or asian briton’ is extremely RACIST.

    No getting away from it.

    I need to clarify your comments on Nick Griffin’s remarks about Israel. The BNP *does* write favourably about Israel and the reason FOR this is because if, heaven forfend, they got into power, they would immediately ‘repatriate’ ALL BRITISH JEWS back TO Israel.

    They would also ‘repatriate’ ALL Black and Asian people.

    So while I do appreciate very much your comments, I need to be really clear: the BNP is a party of neo Nazi thugs and there is no support for them on this blog.

    As for ‘Searchlight’ – it has worked hard to expose racism for many, many years. ‘Hope Not Hate’, likewise, is currently trying to rally people to oppose the BNP. They have my full support.

  4. You’re falling into the same trap everyone else is falling into… we’ve moved on from that, and we need to seriously catch up, the old ideas no longer apply. Nothing is what it was! 😦

    The is a left-wing BNP type kook shop, and curiously so, has many leftard Jewhaters in their club. Let’s just say that things are getting confused at the edges there… %-!

    Don’t underestimate BNP … they are going mainstream and are starting to collect many decent and competent people who are not Nazis but who see them as the only sensible alternative and they have a real bugbear issue for their crusade, one that a lot of people in the UK find important.

    Parties are compromises, you never find a complete match, so, you take a long spoon and hope to steal the palatable morsel from the devil’s plate and try not to think about the rest. Especially when you believe that you’re about to die of starvation…!

    Now, you can view this in many ways, the best (and very likely) thing that can happen is that the core of the BNP gets diluted to the point where so many people who do not deny the holocaust and who find it stupid to do so crowd out the old ideas by creating facts on the ground. Note that Griffin already has started to shift position on Israel, he is trying for a neutrality, he knows that his new punters will not put up with idiotic bigotry. I think (hope) that this is what will happen, but as the pendulum swings… we don’t know. But oh boy, swing it does, and it’s time to start to be afraid I think, because no matter what side wins, it will all end in tears.

    With the repatriation ideas, well, the UK have a lot of 3rd world people move in (about 1/4 million a year) who form ethnic ghettos and often have openly hostile, racist and cultural supremacist attitudes to Westerners. We have a ‘baby boom’ where 25% of kids are born to non UK mothers and entire towns that are monocultural but not indigenous anymore. Basically, the UK is experiencing their own version of Gaza and the West Bank in many parts of their country, and people are getting desperate because the Westminster is fiddling the expenses whilst the UK burns.

    A common train of thought is that most of those folks only turned up in the recent past, so asking them to go back home is not totally unreasonable and people are no longer afraid of thinking those thoughts without conflating it with genocide, in fact they think it’s not neccessary if we only buy everyone a train ticket (basically, it’s not a defined process, but there are high hopes for morality, as always) So, the djinn is out of the bottle… the last time it nearly climbed out, Thatcher firmly stuffed it back and crushed the NF (BNP precurser), but taking the idea over herself and modifying it into sane policy, because it IS reasonable in parts, you can’t have the entire 3rd world move into the UK.

    Cameron can’t do that as easily, there no longer is the ‘clear blue water’ that once was because they owe too many political favours on all sides and are party and privvy to international deals that could probably be termed ‘treason’ without blushing, besides the Tories are *still* very damaged from 1997 and also were caught with their snouts in ‘Troughminster’. People will vote for them whilst holding their nose, because they are the least worst choice, not because they find them believable.

    Go visit the BNP website ( and have a look around and see how they have set up shop and how they are selling their politics. They are the NR. 1 political website in the UK and no longer a kook outfit. In fact, they are so popular, they don’t even need a sane policy (their manifesto is somewhat substandard).

    The BNP doesn’t have “an apparently increasing fan site”, it has a rapidly rising grass roots movement that is the only clear side in this mess and that is starting to get people interested. The BNP is poised to win about 7 seats in the upcoming EU election, and no-platform policy won’t be possible to maintain at that stage anymore either and they will get the same funds other legal parties get too. To wit: recent poll for the EU election showed Tory 41%, BNP 29%, Labour 9%.

    People no longer are prepared to listen to the dogwhistle of the Nazi label anymore, it’s past it’s sell-by-date and like Turkey at New Year, people are sick of the meme, and the more the establishment gets quagmired in schoolyard slurs about the BNP, the less anyone cares. What the hopenotehate, Searchlite and other assorted idiots are doing is bringing a slingshot to a gun fight here, it’s very stupid and if anything makes the BNP’s very point for them.

    Also, the BNP is not a member of the political classes (professional politicians without convictions(well, some have criminal ones, but moral ones are absent totally), see also Oborne’s book), and they have not been serially bribed(yet) by the Islamists.

    So, take another look please, this is serious wake up time for us all, because we’re a lot further down the road than you hoped we were. I leave you with the thought that the latest poll for the EU election is: Tory 41%, BNP 29%, Labour 9%. So even if they are not coming to power, the BNP will shape public opinion in the future UK.

    Understand I’m not voting in the UK and I have no political stakes here at all, I’m just watching a giant train crash in slow motion and it seems that no-one but me is all too aware of the magnitude of this all – they are so wrapped up in their political mantras and dogmas that they don’t see how fast this is all changing and where the maelstrom goes, often because they don’t want to, it’s too uncomfortable to ponder, or it seems too remote.

  5. Thanks for your comments 🙂

    The BNP is a neo Nazi group and always has been. Their manifesto states that there ‘is no such thing as a black or asian briton’. The BNP would, if G-d forbid it got into power, ban mixed ‘race’ relationship and ‘repatriate’ ALL non white British people. The BNP also refers to the Holocaust as a ‘hoax’.

    I would encourage anyone who is concerned about the BNP and their apparently increasing fan base, to visit this site:

  6. In a way yes, in another way, no.

    Right now, the only game in town in the UK that addresses those issues and is clear cut on ‘one side’ without having commitments to the ‘other side’ is the BNP and the nationalist parties on the continent(to some extent, but the NPD is still friends with the Grey Wolf, bless the sheeple who talk of mutual respect (and pass the doner spice)), but, there is a deficiency of philosophy and logic and so, you very quickly hit what could be termed ‘political division by zero’.

    This is the indoctrinated Judenhass those guys never properly thought about what it actually means, it’s easier to hate than to think, especially when the doctrine has become a bonding ritual.

    Listening to those guys flail and squirm about with their new policy on Israel (ever since Griffin realised certain issues, ahem) is quite amusing, they know their thinking here is a complete train crash, but pride prevents the complete satori so far.

    I find the concept of the Nazis naturally losing the evil part of their ideology as it self-destructs and ending up on the ‘other side’ fascinating, reality is the best teacher here, it does it far far better than any explaining, preaching or banning would, maybe morality is just nothing you can instill with theory, it appears to need practical application in order to be understood.

    The intellectual currents churn that is going to happen in the next few month will be interesting, we’ve already come a long way in the past year, no stone has been left on the other, everything is up in the air and nowhere near coalescing yet. Left has turned right and vice versa, people no longer have a defined partisan line, there is no ‘lead sheep’ anymore, and so, the painful process of DIY thinking has started.

    As for the coming challenge, well, our culture and democrazy is about to be tested to destruction.

    On the good side, we’re probably the best educated and equipped side ever, now we just need to develop and remember some morals worth fighting for.

    (hmm, the z is a typo but you know what? Kind of apt so I leave it).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s