AUSTRIAN HOTEL HAS ‘NO JEWS ALLOWED’ POLICY

In the best Nazi tradition, a hotel in Tyrol, Austria, has admitted that it bans Jews from making reservations. The story has been picked up by the daily newspaper Tiroler Tageszeitung, which ran details of this travesty on Sunday.

A Vienna family of seven had had tried to make a reservation at the Haus Sonnenhof apartment hotel in the village of Serfaus, but the owner replied by e-mail that although the room was free, she did not want to take in Jewish guests because of “bad experiences” in the past.

So let’s translate. This hotel had, possibly, ONE difficult guest who happened to be Jewish – and on the basis of this has now banned ALL JEWS.

The particular area in question,   around Serfaus, has become popular among Orthodox Jewish tourists in recent years, and several hotels in Tyrol have started offering kosher food.

Other hoteliers in the area are looking askance at this blatant racism:

At Hotel Alpenruh-Micheluzzi, owner Petra Micheluzzi told the German Press Agency DPA that the rejection by the Sonnenhof was “bad for the image” of Serfaus. One such incident could destroy all the hard work by others in the travel industry, she said. So, no condemnation of the anti semitism, just regret that it will adversely affect tourism…

Irmgard Monz, the owner of the Haus Sonnenhof apartment hotel, could not be reached for comment on Sunday. In an interview with Tiroler Tageszeitung, she offered no justification for her e-mail.

Er, perhaps because there is no ‘justification’ for such outrageous behaviour…?

For his part, the rejected father of five has decided to spend the summer elsewhere: “I don’t want to spend my vacation in such a racist place and I will inform all my friends about what is going on in Tyrol,” the unidentified man was quoted as saying.

Original source: Ha’aretz

Click HERE to read

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “AUSTRIAN HOTEL HAS ‘NO JEWS ALLOWED’ POLICY

  1. Your comment is the perfect illustration of anti semitism – now everyone can see that it still exists and alas did not end with the Holocaust.

    Now, hadn’t you better be running along? I’m sure you don’t wish to be late for your neo Nazi rally.

  2. The problem with people like Bob and Mary O is that they fail to adjust for the scale of a crime. I might agree with Mary that hauling a frail old man into court would seem cruel if the crimes he is accused of were small, but 29000 murders is not something that should be so readily buried under the carpet. To put that number into perspective, it is twenty times the number of Palestinians who were killed during the recent war in Gaza, and for which many people would now like to see an entire country brought to trial.

    And yet even 29000 is tiny compared with the millions of deaths which Bob horrifically dismisses as ‘one bad experience’. If such people cannot adjust for scale, they have lost their sense of reason.

    Stand your ground, Jew with a View.

  3. I need to address the frankly asinine remarks MARY O has made about Demjanjuk.

    MARY O, mazeltov on somehow managing to totally MISunderstand the entire situation. I’ll enlighten you.

    It is entirely up to GERMANY whether or not to extradite this man. GERMANY has opted to do so. Now, last time I checked, there were NO JEWS involved in this decision. So if you have a problem with it, go and take it up WITH THE GERMANS.

    And no, he is not being extradited because anyone thinks he’s a ‘threat’. Quite where you got this bizarre notion I do not know. He is being extradited because clearly the GERMANS believe they have sufficient EVIDENCE to charge him with MASS MURDER.

    And so what if he’s in ‘frail’ condition? What about the thousands of people that never lived long enough to know old age BECAUSE OF HIM?

    If someone murdered YOUR entire family, would YOU vote to just let them get away with it?

    Would you?

    I put it to you that you would not.

    Yet you expect the families of those he murdered to do jus that?

    Well, that would make you a hypocrite, wouldn’t it?

  4. MARY O – who is this ‘you’ that you keep referring to? You state ‘do you jews’ and then later ‘you get people’. Who is this ‘you’?

    Firstly, it’s a highly impolite way of addressing someone. Secondly, are you under the illusion that ALL Jews agree on everything? We don’t. Thirdly, what is this collective thing that ‘we’ are doing to make people so angry…?

    You stated: ‘You seem to push people to the limit, get their blood boiling with rage against you, and then act puzzled when someone tries to drop you a hint. The Austrians are trying to tell you something.’

    Er, who is this ‘you’…?

    And what is this ‘hint’? You imply that by banning ALL Jews, this hotel is trying to tell the Jews of the world something. Let me clarify for you: they haven’t ‘hinted’. They have made their anti semitism very clear by BANNING EVERY JEW ON THE PLANET FROM ENTERING THEIR HOTEL.

    I’ll put to you the same question I put to another poster: would it be acceptable to you if ALL MUSLIMS were similarly banned? How about ALL BLACK PEOPLE? Or ALL GAY PEOPLE?

    That would be OK, would it…?

    No?

    But it’s fine to ban ALL JEWS?

    Interesting.

    _________________________________

  5. Going back to the hotel question, I trust other Jews will learn something from the story.

    There is one country in the world where they will not be banned from a hotel because they are Jews

  6. Mary O Says:
    No one believes that Demjanjuk is any threat, and the claims against him were long ago dismissed in Israel of all places! Forcing his transfer to Germany is cruel in his frail physical condition.

    Let us say for a minute that Demjanjuk was a murderer, are you saying that just because he is not a threat, he should not be punished? That means that if a person lies low long enough, he does not face punishment. That is an alien concept of justice.

    Demjanjuk was found not guilty on appeal in Israel, because it was felt that he had not sufficiently been identified as Ivan the Terrible, with which he had been charged.

    The Germans want to try him simply as a guard who caused the deaths of 29000 people (admittedly they were only Jews.

    According to his son, JD was never at Sobibor, but if he was, he was only a foreign guard. Alternative pleading is ok in civil cases, but not in criminal. Either he was at Sobibor or not. Either he participated in the murders or not. That is for the Germans to determine, if they find that he is fit to stand trial.

  7. To continue addressing what BOB has said:

    Nobody gets ‘thrown in jail’. If in GERMANY, they CHOOSE to make Holocaust Denial a criminal offence, and you take issue with that, then go and take it up with the GERMANS.

  8. BOB, you said: ‘And a group of Jews had ONE bad experience with Germans and National Socialism, and now they insist ALL Germans pay tribute to Israel through taxes, lay a constant guilt trip on ALL White people, and throw EVERYONE in jail who even questions the “official story” of the “Holocaust”.

    Notice any similarities?’

    Let me correct you:

    Jews did not have ‘one bad experience’ with Germans and National Socialism. We had SIX MILLION GROTESQUE ‘experiences’. Quite how you can describe the almost successful genocide of European Jewry as ‘one bad experience’ is beyond me – and I suspect equally beyond most rational adults.

    Your remark about ‘laying a guilt trip on all white people’ reveals utter ignorance about the fact that firstly, many Jews ARE WHITE.

    And perhaps you’d care to offer examples of this ‘guilt trip;.
    I for one have no idea what you are talking about.

    Would you support this Austrian hotel if it banned every single Muslim? Every single Christian? Every single black person? That would be OK with you, would it?

    No? But instead of condemning this hotel for banning EVERY SINGLE JEW, you attack Jews, the people BEING banned…?

    And THEN you try and compare this to the HOLOCAUST?

    Wow.

    Perhaps you’d care to remember that the same people who slaughtered millions of Jews ALSO slaughtered millions of NON Jews. Does the death of millions of NON JEWS also count, with you as ‘one bad experience’…?

  9. I have worked in many American hotels and resorts, some of which have entertained groups for Passover.

    One of the resorts I worked at had the event one year, and one year only because of the hassle it presented for the resort’s staff and other guests. After working this closely with a large group of this nature I can fully understand why the hotel may not want to do business with them.

  10. I’ve got no problem with discrimination. It’s your establishment — you should be able to exclude whomever you want, no questions asked. No, JWAV, it’s not wrong.

  11. “So let’s translate. This hotel had, possibly, ONE difficult guest who happened to be Jewish – and on the basis of this has now banned ALL JEWS.”

    And a group of Jews had ONE bad experience with Germans and National Socialism, and now they insist ALL Germans pay tribute to Israel through taxes, lay a constant guilt trip on ALL White people, and throw EVERYONE in jail who even questions the “official story” of the “Holocaust”.

    Notice any similarities?

  12. Do you Jews understand how angry people are over certain issues today? For example, the Demjanjuk deportation. No one believes that Demjanjuk is any threat, and the claims against him were long ago dismissed in Israel of all places! Forcing his transfer to Germany is cruel in his frail physical condition. Americans are also seething with rage over immigration, while Jewish groups are pushing amnesty. Americans are also enraged by the AIPAC spies not being put on trial. You seem to push people to the limit, get their blood boiling with rage against you, and then act puzzled when someone tries to drop you a hint. The Austrians are trying to tell you something.

  13. Sure, but just because something may be legal, doesn’t mean it’s right.

    Nothing can negate the fact that banning members of an entire religion, or any social group in fact, is wrong. It is discrimination and I would have thought that in Austria, given their past, more care would be taken to behave fairly towards Jews, in particular.

    Thanks for your comments, though 🙂

  14. Depends whether it was what would be known in England as a Common Inn.

    If it isn’t, they can do what they want.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s