This is a follow up about the Christian Evangelists who pose as ‘messianic jews’. The original post was called ‘The Missionary Position’.
This is to address a few queries I have received:
1 Yes, of course Messianics have every right to their own beliefs, rituals and practices.
They just don’t have any right to call it ‘judaism’. Because it isn’t.
2 The Messianic movement is a very specific Christian Evangelical movement.
It does not represent all Christians. Indeed, many Christians have spoken out in condemnation of the Messianics and their lies when they pose as ‘jews’.
Countering The Lies Messianics Tell About Judaism:
Messianics often try to convince Jews that yes, they ‘can remain Jewish and worship while practising Christianity’.
This is simply not true.
Some ex Messianics have spoken of how they received organised training in just *how* to debate genuine Jews. They describe how they actually attended seminars and mock discussions.
Here are some of the most common arguments that Messianics tend to use:
Messianic: “lots of Jews have found Jesus, and are now “Jewish Christians”
FACT: A Jew who becomes a Christian = a Christian.
Nobody can be both Jewish and Christian: it’s a theological contradiction. The two faiths contradict one another on many things.
A Jew who adopts Christianity as their religion is an EX Jew.
They are not ‘a jew for jesus’ any more than a Hindu who becomes a Christian is a ‘hindu for christ’.
Judaism does not permit dual religious identity.
You are a Jew or you are a Christian.
You cannot be both.
Messianic: “Lots of Jews are ethnically or racially Jewish, but Christian by faith.’
Note: This is one of the most common arguments used by Messianics.
FACT:No such thing as being ‘racially‘ Jewish. Jews are not a ‘race’.
It was Hitler that tried to persuade the world that Jewish people were a separate race but it was a lie then, and it is a lie now.
You can’t change your race, but you can change your faith.
Nor is Judaism an ‘ethnicity’. How can it be? Which one ‘ethnicity’ unifies all Jews?
An Indian Jew is not the same ethnicity as a Japanese Jew. A Japanese Jew is not the same ethnicity as a Black Ethiopian Jew.
A Black Ethiopian Jew is not the same ethnicity as a Swedish caucasian Jew.
There are Jews of *all* ethnicities!
And what we share is the Jewish religion.
Messianic: “Messianic ‘jews’ are simply Jews who know the truth about Jesus.”
FACT: 98% of Messianics were *literally* never Jews to start with. Not via birth. Not via conversion. Not via faith. Not via theology. Not via worship. Not via heritage.
If they aren’t Jewish according to Judaism’s criteria, then they are not Jewish – period.
Judaism and only Judaism gets to define Jewish identity.
Just as Christianity and only Christianity gets to define Christian identity.
Messianic: ‘But Jesus was Jewish – so why don’t Jews worship and accept him?’
FACT: Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormons, claimed to be a Christian. Does that mean all Christians should be worshipping him? Clearly not.
Woody Allen is Jewish as well. Does that mean if *he* claimed to be the maschiach we should believe him?
Let’s say Woody Allen did declare that he was the Jewish messiah. Let’s say a small group of Jews believed him and began worshipping him.
Would they still be practising Judaism?
Answer: no, of course not!
Now apply the same logic to Jesus.
Messianic: ‘Religion is a personal thing. I have every right to define myself as Jewish.’
FACT: It’s a private, personal thing until you then enter the public arena and claim to represent a religion that you don’t belong to. You don’t have any ‘right’ to hijack the very word ‘jewish’ and then lie about what it represents.
Judaism has defined Jewish identity the same way for thousands of years. You don’t get to REdefine ‘judaism’ to suddenly INclude practising either Christianity or any other faith.
An analogy:
I can wake up tomorrow and announce I’m a Native American Indian! Does that make it true?
Do I then have the ‘right’ to MISrepresent what Native American Indians stand for, in public forums?No, of course not. And you don’t have any ‘right’ to do it with Judaism!
Messianic: ‘Jesus was Jewish. Therefore if I worship him, I’m Jewish as well.’
FACT: The ‘logic’ here is so flawed it’s bizarre.
The facts are crystal clear: if you worship Jesus as ‘christ’ and if you affirm belief in Christian ideology, you are a *Christian*. Just like if you embrace Islam, follow Mohammed, and affirm belief in Islamic ideology, you are a Muslim.
Let’s say Woody Allen declared himself the Jewish messiah. If you believed him, would that make you Jewish?
Answer: no, of course not! Judaism was a complete and fulfilling faith for thousands of years before Jesus was even a twinkle in Joseph’s eye.
Messianic: ‘The ‘old testament’ refers to Jesus again and again. Jews are just too stubborn to see it.’
FACT: Given that the OT is a purely Christian text, yes, it probably does point towards Jesus.
The OT was produced by the Church, and while some versions are reliable and really good, others are mistranslated, reorganised and reinterpreted, Christianised versions OF the Jewish Tanakh.
Jews study and read the Tanakh in the original Hebrew. We don’t use any translation. And in the original Hebrew, Jesus is nowhere to be found. Jesus himself read the Tanakh, in Hebrew, just as Jews across the world do today.
* (note: you can find a detailed list of some of these mistranslations in the Scripture section of this blog)
“jews for jesus”
Sooner or later someone will ask you about the infamous group ‘jews4jesus’. This is the most aggressive and well known of all the Messianic groups. Let’s be crystal clear:
‘jews4jesus’ is a Christian group. It was founded by Martin Meyer, an ordained Baptist minister.
Baptists don’t get to REdefine Judaism. Nor do Baptist Ministers get to start a ‘new jewish sect’ that practises a form of Christianity!
Usually, Martin Meyer goes by the name Martin ‘Rosen’. He apparently feels it sounds more ‘jewish’. And at times, he claims that his parents were Orthodox Jews. This may or may not be true. Either way, it’s utterly irrelevant. Even if he started out a Jew, Martin Meyer exercised his right to leave Judaism, and to convert to Christianity.
Among the members of ‘jews4jesus’ there are a few former Jews. The key word here is of course: former.
If a few Jews convert to Islam – does Islam become somehow ‘jewish’?
No, of course not.
If a group of Jews become Hindus – does Hinduism now equal ‘judaism’?
No, obviously not.
Same applies to Christianity. Just because a few EX Jews are now Christians, this does not make Christianity somehow ‘jewish’.
Be aware: members of ‘jews4jesus’ are slick, quick and very practised at answering Jews who are trying to expose their lies.
One of the group’s favourite claims is:
”The original followers of Jesus were ‘messianic jews’. We’re no different’.
Just remind them that firstly, only a tiny sect of Jews ever followed Jesus. And the minute they affirmed belief in the ‘resurrection’ and in the notion that Jesus was anything BUT a normal mortal man, they were effectively *leaving* Judaism.
And the original followers of Jesus never practised Christianity because it did not exist until long after Jesus died. The rituals and beliefs of ‘jews4jesus’ has little in common with those who were part of the sect headed up by Jesus.
You might also like to point out that even if Jews were the first disciples of Jesus, it’s irrelevant. Consider: The first Australians were Brits. Does that mean that today’s Aussies get to REdefine British identity, customs and laws?



Shalom.
In my fight against vicious anti-semitism, the Messianics are there the most.
Comment by themadjewess — June 11, 2009 @ 11:42 am
Shalom Mad Jewess!
(love your blog name, am going to come and visit your site
)
I agree with you. I find the Messianics far more spiteful than those who are openly anti semitic. They use the very name of OUR faith in their bid to convert Jews to their own warped form of Christianity. I loathe them with a passion – and I have no problem in openly stating it!
Thanks for stopping by
Comment by Jew With A View — June 11, 2009 @ 3:04 pm
yasher koach! I also loathe Messyantics.
How dare they steal our identities.
Use our holy Torah
to worship their man god.
They are beyond contempt.
Comment by SheitlQueen — June 25, 2009 @ 6:13 am
Hi
I posted a comment but I do not see it yet. Are comments moderated? Or did you just not like what I said?
Remember people have free will. You have free will to hate messianics and messianics who were Jews have freedom to become Messianics.
Or do you NOT believe in freedom of choice?
Comment by Charles Pedley — June 25, 2009 @ 11:18 pm
Er, Charles? I’m sure you didn’t mean it but you’re sounding a tad confrontational…:)
I’ve only just seen my blog for the *first* time today – remember, here in the UK it’s morning and I’m busy working!
To answer your query:
I don’t ‘hate’ Messianics. But just as you, as a devout Christian, would counter any lies being told about YOUR faith, so too all Jews MUST counter the lies Messianics are telling about OUR faith.
Also, to clarify:
A Jew who adopts any other faith, becomes an EX Jew.
Just as a Christian who adopts any other faith, becomes an EX Christian.
That is correct…? Am I right in my assumption that a Christian who adopts another faith, ceases to be a Christian…?
I’m assuming it is, do tell me if I’m wrong.
A Jew is, of course, free to leave Judaism! A Jew if free, of course, to adopt ANY other faith!
What they CANNOT then do is go round claiming to STILL be ‘jewish’!
If a Christian one day decided they didn’t believe Jesus was divine, or didn’t believe he was the messiah, or didn’t believe he existed, you surely wouldn’t agree to their still defining themselves as a ‘christian’???
Same for Judaism. If a Jew adopts Christianity – they are then A CHRISTIAN. They are violating Torah by worshipping a mortal as ‘divine’ and by affirming belief in the Trinity and the virgin birth and the resurrection and in vicarious atonement.
They cannot violate Torah, and Judaism, and then go round claiming to be ‘jewish’!
A Jew who becomes a Christian = A CHRISTIAN
Just as a Christian who becomes a Jew = A JEW
Comment by Jew With A View — June 26, 2009 @ 10:56 am
And just to clarify: this is not a ‘freedom of choice’ issue.
A Christian is not ‘free’ to lie and claim to be a ‘jew’.
Just as a Jew is not ‘free’ to lie and claim to be a ‘hindu’ or a ‘christian’ or a ‘muslim’!
Comment by Jew With A View — June 26, 2009 @ 10:57 am
Liberal-Muslim loving Jews in America ARE MY problem.
Comment by themadjewess — June 26, 2009 @ 11:19 am
Shalom! A Jew will always be a Jew. It’s in your blood, it is God’s promise to Jews, you are God’s chosen people. Even if you leave your religion,or not practice Judaism, you will always be a Jew. Christians, Hindus, Muslems are all gentiles, they can never be real Jews even if they wanted to and even if they convert to Judaism. It is foolish to think that once you become a Christian, you are no longer a Jew. It is in your blood, it is your blessing and promise from God. Look at the family tree going back over 3000 years, if you have Jewish blood heritage in you, you remain a Jew forever. It is that simple……..
Shalom! And God bless…..
Comment by nomas — June 28, 2009 @ 4:28 am
Perhaps it would be useful to have some perspective on this debate. First, it is IMPOSSIBLE to define Chrsitianity outside of Judaism. Christians believe that Jesus is the fulfillment of the law and the prophets. To have this debate without this kind of realism shows a real insincerity because christians claim their authority based on the their belief in JEWISH historisity. This is of course distinct from any other religion like Bhuddism et al. because Bhuddism, Hinduism do not claim any relation to Judaism, nor does christianity, like Islam, claim that the “original message” was somehow corrupted. Rather, christians accept the law and the prophets as the Word of the LORD.
Rejecting or accepting Jesus as Messiah is a question which ought to be addressed with special consideration because this is the real question. Is Jesus the fulfillment of the law and the prophets as he claims, oris the Messiah yet to come? Bhuddism, Shintoism, Islam, Hinduism all regard this question as unfamiliar. I.E. What Messiah? Only Judiasm & Christianity regard even the question valid.
If not Jesus, then who?
Comment by Anonymous — June 30, 2009 @ 6:18 am
NOMAS:
Sorry, but you’re talking utter nonsense. You’re also subscribing to the Nazi notion that being ‘jewish’ is something in the ‘blood’.
It’s entirely incorrect.
Jews are a faith and a family. We are not a ‘race’ so perhaps you’d care to stop spreading the offensive and irrational idea that we are. Non Jews that join the Jewish family are adopted and they are then 100% Jewish – AS Jewish as those born into the faith. This is what the Talmud says – and YOU don’t get to REdefine what Judaism itself says on this matter.
And contrary to your incorrect assertions, a Jew that becomes a Christian IS A CHRISTIAN. An Apostate. Historically they had to convert BACK to Judaism if they wished to return to the Jewish faith. Again, your absurd comments reveal a total ignorance. So perhaps, before holding forth on what another faith says you should CHECK that you have the FACTS. Which you do not have.
Unlike you, I know many Jews who were originally Gentiles – I can assure you they are ‘real jews’. Your comments are really bizarre and represent a total MISunderstanding of Judaism.
There is NO SUCH THING as ‘jewish blood’.
Get your facts straight.
Comment by Jew With A View — June 30, 2009 @ 8:44 am
ANONYMOUS:
I appreciate your comments. Yes, of course for many Christians, the Jewish religion has significance. That said, for Jews, core Christian ideology constitutes the rejection of Jewish beliefs. That’s fine, it doesn’t make any difference to Jews as we believe ALL righteous souls reach heaven.
Just to slightly clarify your last comment: Jews don’t ‘reject’ Jesus per se. We just won’t worship anyone who hasn’t fulfilled our prophecies in one mortal lifetime.
No one person can be the ‘fulfillment’ of Jewish religious laws or Torah. The very notion is specifically Christian.
Comment by Jew With A View — June 30, 2009 @ 8:49 am
Jew with a View, my comment was not absurb. Jews are physical descendants of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, that is what I meant by “Jewish blood”. And no one can ever take that away from Jewish people no matter what they become if they become Christians.
Comment by nomas — July 1, 2009 @ 4:08 am
NOMAS,
Sorry, but some of your comments really were not accurate…
Yes, agreed, we are descendants of the patriarchs, but it’s not a genetic link; we are part of the same religious family. So when a Gentile converts to Judaism, for instance, they also become part of the Jewish family. In fact, the Talmud says that non Jews who consciously choose to join Judaism are regarded with a special affection by G-d.
That’s what I was referring to when I said some of your comments were ‘absurd’ – because it simply isn’t true that non Jews who convert ‘are not proper jews’! They are as Jewish as Jews born into the faith.
When a Jew joins another faith, any other faith, they become an ex Jew. Yes – they still have a Jewish heritage, nothing can change the fact that they were born into the Jewish faith. But if they are practising another religion, they cannot call themselves ‘jews’. Just as an ex Christian is no longer a Christian.
I hope that clarifies? Thank you for your comments, please feel welcome to post again
Comment by Jew With A View — July 1, 2009 @ 5:27 pm
Jew with a View,
I am a fierce Christian Zionist, I did not mean to disrespect you at all. I understand what you are telling me. God bless you, always.
Shalomm!
Comment by nomas — July 1, 2009 @ 11:39 pm
NOMAS:
Many thanks indeed for your kind words
I do hope you’ll feel welcome to come back and post again – apologies if I reacted a tad sharply initially, sometimes the term ‘jewish blood’ has that effect BUT I realise you meant well
And of course, as always, lovely to know that our Christian friends are united with us in support for Israel!
I’m working right now on a post about Jewish-Christian relations, if you have time do pop back later in the week and see what you think
Shalom!
Comment by Jew With A View — July 2, 2009 @ 12:32 am
Hi!
I, a Christian, am puzzled as to why “Messianic Jews” seem so bitter when confronted about their beliefs! (Had a “run-in” with one recently!!)
Also, aren’t ALL Jews technically Messianic??
Frankly, they dishonor Christianity & Judaism both.
I assure you, they DO NOT represent true Christians.
You are correct, someone who leaves Christianity is no longer a Christian.
{{{hug}}}
Comment by SJC — July 4, 2009 @ 2:18 am
Is that my buddy SJC from Yahoo?
Assuming yes – ((((SJC))))
How you doing?!
You’re 100% correct in your perceptive statement about all Jews being inherently messianic! Judaism is a messianic faith as we await the Jewish maschiach, while of course respecting that our Christian friends believe in and worship Jesus as messiah
Messianics tend to get defensive when anyone points out that they lie by calling themselves ‘jews’, because they know they’ve been rumbled!!!
Messianics do not represent true Christians – as illustrated by lovely folk like you!
So kind of you to stop by, do come again!!! I’ll see you back on YA this week as well!
Comment by Jew With A View — July 4, 2009 @ 8:19 am
Yep, I’m the Y/A SJC!
I’m doing great, hope you are to.
Just a couple more points:
“Messianic Jew” is redundant, sort of like saying feline cat!!
I think it’s insulting for the so-called “Messianic Jews” to use the term “non-Messianic Jews.”
I would be indignant if someone left Christianity & joined another faith & then tried to convince Christians that Jesus wasn’t divine!
Anyway, that’s all for now, take care!
)
Comment by SJC — July 4, 2009 @ 1:31 pm
Firstly of course we must all unite to counter Xtrian missionaries of all types and find ways to increase our Jewish learning and education to do this.
Unfortunately a side debate has come up, which ought to be taken out of this forum into a more suitable framework.
Western (from Xtrian) values talk about universalism, separation of religion and people-hood and other concepts which are not the Torah way of looking at things. For example, since the fall of the British Empire, nationhood is a “dirty” word in England. The Torah was given to the Israelite Nation for us to keep, primarily in our Land. Due to our sins, we were distanced from our Land, but nethertheless we did not loose our status as a Nation with our obligations. A Jew is a Jew if he has a Jewish mother. However far a Jew falls, he stills remains a Jew. Someone can also become a Jew by converting and this not only just changing a belief system but also joining the Jewish Nation (for the better). Biblical Ruth said “your People will be my People”.
Thus the argument that some posters are trying to present that Jewishness is a religion like Xtrianity is a religion is not a correct argument in our world-view. Unfortunately it is the latent and somewhat successful efforts of the nations to train our thinking along those lines that has created such a misunderstanding.
Comment by David — July 27, 2009 @ 10:53 am
I had a closer look at the thread where the side debate came up. I see that it was Nomas who describes himself as a “fierce Christian Zionist” who seems to have the closer Jewish perspective here.
It is actually a debate in the Talmud whether a righteous convert has a greater or lesser spiritual status as someone born as a Jew. Whatever conclusions to the debate are possible, it is definite that a righteous convert has a special place under the “kisai hakavod”.
Comment by David — July 27, 2009 @ 11:20 am
Many thanks for your most interesting comments, David
I’ve always been given to understand that righteous gentiles have the same spiritual ’status’ as Jews, and that anyone, of any faith, who studies Torah has the same status as the most learned and observant Jewish scholar
Comment by Jew With A View — July 27, 2009 @ 2:46 pm
David, I agree; Judaism is a tribal faith. This is not true of Christianity. Christianity is a faith-based religion: if a person affirms belief in and worship of, they can define themselves as belonging to a Christian movement. Christianity is in this way far more inclusive than Judaism.
Judaism, as you touch upon, is more about tribal lineage. If the person’s mother isn’t Jewish, they are not Jewish, no matter how passionately and sincerely they may follow Torah and take part in Jewish rituals, customs, etc. Effectively, being Jewish is a ‘legal’ status that must be in accordance with Jewish religious law or halacha.
Comment by Jew With A View — July 27, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
I would not use the word “tribal”. You are right that “shevet” is usually translated as “tribe” as in “The 12 Tribes”, but despite the territorial divisions within the Land of Israel, everyone kept the same Torah (law). “Tribal”, at least in my mindset, gives the impression of smaller groups each with its own law and culture, which was not so with the Nation of Israel. [Cohanim and Leviim of course had a separate status and did not own land.]
The primary organization though, of us on our Land, is as a nation with a King and a Bet haMikdash (Temple) and an economic system as determined within the Torah (both written and oral). King David did not achieve everything and nor did King Solomon (although he indeed built the first Bet HaMikdash). No king after that reached the same stature as David nor Solomon, but Jews believe that when there is an anointed king (melech mashuach) descended from David that completes all this work, he has proven himself as Mashiach. We are still waiting for ben David (descendant of David).
We were, unfortunately, many centuries without our land, but we never lost the concept of nationhood, and this is reflected in our prayers.
Concerning gentiles and righteous converts:
Righteous converts join the Jewish People and become Jews like everyone else (although there are a few marital restrictions). Because we were “strangers in a strange land”, we have a special imperative to treat a convert nicely (a convert, because of his up-bringing and possibly facial features, is naturally always going to be a little bit “different”). We are not allowed to remind him/her of his/her background. This, though, did not prevent the talmud from discussing whether a righteous convert has the same spiritual potential as a Jew who is born such. Discussions like this are usually recorded for the philosophical learning (although there might also be some technical legal ramification) and both negative and positive answers are valid conclusions.
Gentiles can reach their potential by keeping the seven laws of Noach (sheva mitzvot b’nei Noach). Nowadays, there are international organizations that help gentiles who so wish, to do so. They are not obligated to keep anything else in the Torah. They are forbidden to keep Shabbat, which means a Non-Jew who is studying to convert has to do something explicit to break a law of Shabbat (e.g. strike a match) for this reason.
Gentiles also have the possibility to join us by converting (giur).
We nowadays do not encourage gentiles to convert (although there is a religious argument now whether to encourage non-Jewish Russians who are already placing their lot with the Jewish People in Israel, to convert), and we tell the Non-Jew that he can better himself with the 7 laws, and becoming a Jew means accepting obligations that maybe(s)he would be better without. If he still wants to go ahead, we should not stop him/her because such a person understands that accepting these obligations is a privilege by which (s)he can improve his/her spiritual status.
I would therefore not say <<>> but rather <<>>
This is the way I understand the Torah perspective.
Comment by David — July 27, 2009 @ 8:17 pm
My second from last sentence did not appear, maybe because of the quotes style. I will try again:
I would therefore not say:
“righteous gentiles have the same spiritual ’status’ as Jews” but rather:
“righteous gentiles have the potential to reach their spiritual ’status’ in the same way as Jews have the potential of reaching theirs”
Comment by David — July 27, 2009 @ 8:23 pm
DAVID,
Many thanks indeed for your excellent points, which I’m sure will be of great interest to all those reading these pages.
I agree with all that you say
One thing we can maybe note: although of course Judaism is not evangelistic, it used to be more so, way way back. It’s interesting to me that the prohibition against encouraging Gentiles to convert did not always hold true, though mostly it has.
You are right, of course, about the Noahide Laws and for any Gentiles reading this who are keen to learn more:
http://www.noahide.org/
Please feel welcome to comment further on this or other issues DAVID – we are now at http://www.ajewwithaview.com
Comment by Jew With A View — July 27, 2009 @ 8:33 pm
I am pleased that I was able to contribute to the discussion. You are correct that there were periods in time when giur was more encouraged.
Comment by David — July 27, 2009 @ 8:51 pm